Friday, May 11, 2018

COA upholds dismissal of election challenges

xX
X
https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/21158-coa-upholds-dismissal-of-election-challenges
X
x

COA upholds dismissal of election challenges

May 28, 2009

KEYWORDS ELECTION / CIVIL CASE / MUNCIE / DELAWARE COUNTY / INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS / COURT OPINIONS / COURTS / NEGLECT

Today Indiana's appellate courts are dealing with two mayoral election disputes, with the Court of Appeals ruling on one in Muncie and the Supreme Court hearing arguments in another from Terre Haute.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Democratic candidate Jim Mansfield's challenges to Republican candidate Sharon McShurley being named Muncie mayor after a recount Dec. 20. Mansfield was declared the winner of the election until a recount filed by the Delaware County Republican Party led to the discovery of 19 invalid absentee ballots - with 18 votes being for Mansfield. The absentee ballots weren't recounted because they had been distributed to voters without the initials of a Republican member of the election board.

Mansfield brought his petition for election contest a week after the recount. The trial court dismissed it because it didn't have jurisdiction to hear it because it wasn't filed within the statutory 14-day time period after Election Day. The trial court also dismissed his Feb. 13, 2008, amended complaint in quo warranto.

In Jim Mansfield and state ex rel. Mansfield v. Sharon McShurley and Delaware County, Indiana Election Board, No. 18A02-0804-CV-375, the appellate court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the election contest and quo warranto complaint. Mansfield argued he couldn't have filed his election contest within the 14-day statutory limit because he didn't learn he wasn't the official winner until after the time limit had passed.

The Court of Appeals didn't find Arredondo v. Lake Circuit Court, 271 Ind. 176, 391 N.E. 2d 597 (Ind. 1979), and Pabey v. Pastrick, 816 N.E.2d 1138, 1143 (Ind. 2004), applicable to the instant case because they dealt with the question of whether a trial court's failure to hold a hearing within the time prescribed by statute divested it of jurisdiction it had already acquired. The cases didn't establish exceptions to the 14-day jurisdictional requirement in the election contest statute, wrote Judge Melissa May.

The Court of Appeals acknowledged the "unusual result" the application of the statutory time limit causes, but the availability of quo warranto gives a challenger a day in court even if a recount changes the result.

story continues below

Mansfield conceded the disputed absentee ballots couldn't be counted in the recount, but alleged the ballots were still legal because they were legitimate ballots made invalid by the election officials' mistake. They shouldn't be considered fraudulent like those addressed in Pabey and a special election should occur because several voters were disenfranchised by the mistake.

But the Court of Appeals ruled the trial court didn't err in dismissing Mansfield's complaint on the ground the recount commission did nothing unlawful when it declined to count certain ballots. It also ruled McShurley wasn't entitled to attorneys' fees because Mansfield's complaint and appeal weren't frivolous.

Mansfield's attorney William Groth was disappointed by the opinion because he believed there are substantial legal issues of first impression that would be interesting to take up on transfer, he said in an e-mail to Indiana Lawyer Daily. The issue is whether the Supreme Court's ruling in Pabey, which held courts retain jurisdiction to order a special election when a candidate doesn't meet the statutory time limits through no fault of his own, should be extended to the facts of the instant case. Another issue is whether the ballots cast by the absentee voters were "distributed by mistake" within the meaning of Indiana Code Section 3-12-8-2 such that a special election should have been ordered, he said. The final issue is whether the application of the Indiana Election Code, by providing a right and remedy to the initially certified loser but not to the winner, violates the Open Courts and Privileges and Immunities clauses of the Indiana Constitution.

"The unfortunate ultimate result is that 19 blameless voters remain disenfranchised, and that disenfranchisement not only affected them, it changed the outcome of the election," he said.

Groth wasn't sure if his client will consider appealing to the Supreme Court.

The high court heard arguments this morning in Duke Bennett v. Kevin D. Burke, No. 84S01-0904-CV-148, in which Kevin Burke is challenging whether Duke Bennett could have been elected mayor of Terre Haute because he worked for a nonprofit that received federal funds right before he ran for mayor.

Source: \XML\XML3927.xml

x
x
x
x
x
x

Thursday, May 10, 2018

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN MAY 10 2018

X
X

X
Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, in September 2017. In the pages of his memoir, he doesn’t surrender to brain cancer, but he clearly accepts that his time may be short.CreditTom Brenner/The New York Times
X
X
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/us/politics/john-mccain-memoir.html
X
X

By Carl Hulse

May 10, 2018

WASHINGTON — Senator John McCain wasn’t interested in getting the last word on his decades at the center of American political life. He was interested in getting thousands of them.

In a new 380-page memoir written as he confronts brain cancer and his mortality, the occasionally ornery maverick Republican from Arizona looks back on a series of major episodes from both his own history and the United States’.

He recounts his presidential runs, his leading roles in fights over immigration, campaign finance, health care and foreign policy. He takes a few shots at President Trump, talk radio “blowhards” and House backbenchers. He says he would like Americans to “recover our sense that we are more alike than different.”

True to his nature, John McCain is not one to go quietly.

“It should be required reading for anyone who wants to lead in a democracy,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and Mr. McCain’s best friend in the Senate. He sees the book as a call to arms around the idea that “America’s values make us better than our enemies.”

Mr. Graham visited Mr. McCain on Tuesday in Arizona, where they watched their favorite western, one that features an idealistic senator: “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.” Mr. Graham found Mr. McCain upbeat and gaining strength.

“I hope he has another run in him,” said Mr. Graham, reflecting a sentiment shared widely in Washington.

You have 4 free articles remaining.

Subscribe to The Times

Written with his frequent collaborator Mark Salter, a former aide and longtime adviser of Mr. McCain’s, the book is titled, “The Restless Wave,” in a nod to the long naval tradition of the McCain family.

It is reminiscent of the 2009 valedictory “True Compass,” written by Senator Edward M. Kennedy, who died of cancer shortly before its publication. The form of glioblastoma that claimed Mr. Kennedy and is now putting Mr. McCain in peril is just another of the ties between two larger-than-life figures in a Senate that has fewer and fewer of them.

In the pages of his memoir, Mr. McCain doesn’t surrender to the disease, but he clearly accepts that his time may be short.

“Like my friend Ted, I might have fought my last immigration battle,” Mr. McCain writes, noting that though he sponsored a new measure with a Democratic colleague, “I’m not as sure that I’ve sufficient time left to see it all the way through. That, alas, isn’t my call to make.”

One question arising from Mr. McCain’s illness and his extended absence from Washington is what will become of the Senate with fewer members with the force of personality, political standing and will to bring increasingly polarized lawmakers together on major issues?

Mr. McCain notes in his book that Mr. Kennedy “gave value no other senator had” when developing legislation because of his outsize influence on Democrats and his overall level of respect in the institution.

Mr. McCain achieved that stature, as well, as one of the few senators able to command the attention of members of both parties on big topics.

The absence of Mr. McCain’s voice is particularly notable this week with foreign policy moves such as the White House decision towithdraw from the Iran nuclear deal as well as a debate over past C.I.A. torture — a topic that Mr. McCain can speak to like no one else because of his mistreatment as a captive in Vietnam.

He weighed in Wednesday night on Twitter, saying that the refusal of Gina Haspel, the nominee for C.I.A. director, to acknowledge that torture was immoral was disqualifying, but his statement probably didn’t have the same power it would have had Mr. McCain taken the Senate floor to deliver it surrounded by colleagues and televised on C-Span.

Casting about the Senate, it is hard to identify others who today hold similar potential to move colleagues away from hardened positions. Mr. McCain might not always triumph, but he knew how to force the issue on subjects many in the chamber would just as soon avoid for political reasons.

But even Mr. McCain struggled with the new tribal politics, tempering some of his more moderate instincts when he faced challenges from the right in his recent re-election campaigns.

It is only now, with no more campaigns ahead of him, that he is truly liberated from conventional political considerations. “I’m freer than colleagues who will face the voters again,” he says in the book. “I can speak my mind without fearing the consequence much. And I can vote my conscience without worry.”

That freedom was on vivid display over the summer when Mr. McCainplayed a deciding role in preventing Republican colleagues from repealing the Affordable Care Act. First, he returned from a draining cancer treatment to deliver a stirring speech for more bipartisanship. He recalls in the book how those remarks provoked tears from fellow senators even though “I had argued with every single one of them, and I’m certain I had offended more than a few of them.” (Fact check: definitely true.)

Days later, he cast a dramatic post-midnight, thumbs-down vote that blocked a desperate effort to deliver on a major Republican campaign promise by overturning the health care law.

“It didn’t feel that dramatic to me at the time,” Mr. McCain says. He admits to feeling bad about disappointing his fellow Republicans. “It was a hard vote that I didn’t make easily, but not one I would hesitate to make again.”

It was at its heart a vote for a return to what’s known in Congress as “regular order,” a less partisan, more civil and results-driven process during which lawmakers from both parties cooperate to produce a consensus product. Mr. McCain notes gleefully in the book that he was once attacked by an opponent as a “champion of compromise.”

“You’re damn right, I’m a champion of compromise in the governance of a country of 325 million opinionated, quarrelsome, vociferous souls,” he writes. “There is no other way to govern an open society, or more precisely, to govern it effectively.”

Mr. McCain, who has an explosive temper, has long been one of the more prickly members of the Senate. But as in his relationship with Mr. Kennedy, he was usually able to put aside hard feelings. For instance, he enjoyed multiple nasty exchanges over the years with Harry Reid of Nevada, the former Democratic leader, but says, “I could never quite sustain a permanent dislike for the guy.” As for Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, Mr. McCain said reports of friction between them are overblown (though Mr. McConnell did take his fight against his colleague’s signature campaign finance law to the Supreme Court).

Mr. McCain doesn’t seek sympathy and says he hopes those who mourn his passing, “and even those who don’t,” should lead “lives as lucky as mine.”

Most of Mr. McCain’s Senate colleagues consider themselves lucky to have shared their service with him and worry about the consequences of the loss of such a unique political figure.

Get politics and Washington news updates via Facebook, Twitter and the Morning Briefing newsletter.

X
X

X

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

FACEBOOK POLICE RULES DETAILED

X
YOUR COMMENT HAS BEEN TERMINATED!
X

X
https://www.facebook.com/topic/Facebook/113762891967952?source=whfrt&position=2&trqid=6547982306815580911&impressionguid=0YSoa3mAimxY6vbZn
X
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-abuse/facebook-releases-long-secret-rules-on-how-it-polices-the-service-idUSKBN1HV0VR
X
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-24/facebook-publishes-content-removal-policies-for-the-first-time
X
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/24/facebook-finally-explains-why-it-bans-some-content-in-27-pages/?noredirect=on
X
https://www.npr.org/2018/04/24/605107093/facebook-updates-community-standards-expands-appeals-process
X
https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/
XX
https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/
X
https://newsroom.fb.com/
X
X
X

X
X

Saturday, April 21, 2018

JULIE K CUSICK PATRICIA R LINDSAY ARE EVIL THIEVING SCHEMERS

X MUG SHOTS

X

PATRICIA R LINDSAY JULIE K CUSICK
X

#PattiLindsay aka #PatriciaRLindsay aka #PatriciaMarieRoach (left)

#JulieCusick aka #JulieKCusick aka #JulieKathleenRoach (right)

Photo from blog post cited in their court complaint noted above

the have also cited their home addresses; & other information- which is all public information online anyway-

or in court records of their own-

blog post in question- ( also cited in their complaint) 

link is here:

https://x-wire2012.blogspot.com/2018/04/julie-k-cusick-patricia-r-lindsay-are.html

full post title is this:

JULIE K CUSICK PATRICIA R LINDSAY ARE EVIL THIEVING SCHEMERS

X

SCROLL WAAAY DOWN- TO READ A REDACTED LETTER THEIR LAWYER MARK WITMER SENT TO MY ATTORNEYS WHO REPRESENTED MY MOTHER IN HER FINAL PERSONAL AFFAIRS-
IT INFURIATES ME THEY ARE DRAGGING MY MOTHER & MYSELF THROUGH THEIR TWISTED SICK SCHEME& TABLOID DIRT-
SCROLL WAAAY DOWN :
XX

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system Thank You.

Pursuant to US Treasury Rules and Regulations, I am required to inform you that any advice in this communication is not and/or was not intended to be used, or written to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid any governmental penalty that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

From: Traci Bixler [mailto:tbixler@beckmanlawson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 3:57 PM
To: REDACTED FOR PRESENT MOMENT
Cc: Mark Witmer <mwitmer@beckmanlawson.com>
Subject: Anastasia S. Roach Estate

Gentlemen:

Please see the attached letter.

Kind regards,

Traci Bixler

Paralegal

Beckman Lawson, LLP

201 West Wayne Street

Fort Wayne, IN 46802

Phone 260 422 0800

Fax 260 420 1013

tbixler@beckmanlawson.com

http://www.beckmanlawson.com

NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by Beckman Lawson, LLP for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named addressee (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email or by calling Beckman Lawson, LLP at (260) 422-0800 (collect) so that our address record can be corrected.

X
TEXT HAS BEEN REDACTED- FOR THE MOMENT-
CONTENTS ARE THEIR TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR ALLOWING MY MOTHERS WIL TO BE COMPLETED PROCESSED IN ALLEN COUNTY PROBATE COURT- BASICALLY KICKING ME TO THE CURB-
THIS "NEGOTIATION" IS KNOWN AT THE MOMENT AS A "FAMILY SETTLEMENT"- LEGAL EXTORTION- AS IN - PAY US WHAT WE WANT; & WE WONT TIE THIS UP IN ENDLESS LITIGATION & CONCURRENT LEGAL & LAWYER COSTS & TIME & VEXATION-
& HOW I AM SUPPOSED TO LIVE IN MY MOTHERS HOUSE ( WHICH SHE DESIGNATED TO GO TO ME)- & HOW I AM SUPPOSED TO SPEND ANY MONEY THAT I AM ALSO LEGALLY ENTITLED TO PER MY MOTHERS WISHES AS DESIGNATED IN HER WILL.
THEY HAVE RECEIVED THEIR PAY OUTS- A LOT of money- they could buy TWO AVERAGE HOUSES to give you an idea-
X
I think I'll negotiate how Hitler negotiated with Europe after he ran over it-
how about noooo!!
X
X
I'M BEING BLACKMAILED; LEGALLY EXTORTED BY MY TWO EVIL THIEVING SISTERS- WHO ARE TRYING TO EXTORT WHATS KNOWN AS A "FAMILY sETTLEMENT"- BECAUSE THEY ALLEGE THEY DIDNT GET THEIR "FAIR SHARE"- OF MY MOTHER'S ESTATE & WILL DECREE-
X
SO- THEY HAVE HIRED A LAWYER- TO LEGALLY EXTORT MORE FROM MOM'S ESTATE WHICH SHE DESIGNATED ME AS HER SOLE HEIR; & SOLE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE& " UNSUPERVISED ESTATE"- SO AS TO PREVENT MY @#$%^&^%$#@ TWO SISTERS FROM MEDDLING OR INTERFERING OR OTHERWISE FCKING UP THE PROCESS WHICH IS WHY MY MOTHER WROTE HER WILL & "PUBLISHED" IT THE WAY SHE DID-
SO i WOULDNT HAVE TO PUT UP WITH THEIR BULLSHT EVER AGAIN; & I COULD SIMPLY "DIVORCE MY SISTERS"- DISOWN THEM; WHATEVER- & SO MY POORER SISTER WOULDNT CONSTANTLY BE BEGGING FOR MONEY BECAUSE OF HER OWN PERSONAL FOULED UP LIFE - GO ASK YOUR SISTER WITH ALL THE MONEY.
LEAVE DAVID ALONE.
MY MOTHER KNEW I WOULD BE A GOOD STEWARD OF HER "LEGACY" -HER "ROACH FAMILY FORTUNE"- AFTER HAVING LIVED FRUGALLY FOR ALL THESE YEARS.
A MOTHER KNOWS HER OFFSPRING-
SHE KNEW PATTI & JULIE WOULD TURN ON ME WHEN SHE PASSED ON-
AGAIN- THIS WHOLE BALL OF LEGAL CRAP IS PROOF OF THE "PUDDING"-

WITHOUT GOING INTO TOO MUCH DETAIL- THE ARE TRYING TO MAKE A CASE I WAS A BAD SON; THAT I WAS MEAN TO MY MOTHER; THAT I "BULLIED MY MOTHER; THAT I EXERTED UNDUE INFLUENCE; THAT I "BRAINWASHED HER" ; TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HER; BASICALLY THAT I WAS THE "BAD SEED"- DESPITE MY BEING MOM'S "ROCK & PROTECTOR- HER ROCK; BLOCKING MY TWO @#$%$#@ SISTERS FROM HAVING MOM DECLARED "MENTALLY INCOMPETENT"- "UNSOUND MIND"- AND THEREFORE UNABLE TO TAKE CARE OF HERSELF; OR HER FINANCES; OR SIGN A LEGAL WILL.

THEN NEXT- WAS THEIR SCHEME TO HAVE MOM SHIPPED OFF TO SOME FAR OFF "INEXPENSIVE" "AFFORDABLE" NURSING HOME- PARTICULARLY ONE FOR THE MENTALLY INCOMPETENT-
i WAS MY MOTHER'S PROTECVTOR- BECAUSE MY MOTHER WANTED TO LIVE IN HER OWN HOME; UNTIL HER LAST DAY- & I WAS THE HELPER & FACILITATOR-
MY SISTERS WERE ALWAYS "TOO BUSY"- TO DO ANYTHING LIKE SCRUB BATHROOMS; MOW THE LAWN; OR GIVE ME A "DAY OFF"-
OR DROP OFF "CARE PACKAGES" OF LEFTOVERS; OR TAKE MOM TO LUNCH OR DINNER; OR CALL ON THEIR ggg-ddaamm "SMART PHONES"-

AND A WHOLE LIST OF ALLEGATIONS; ACCUSATIONS THAT IF THIS WAS IN CRIMINAL COURT- THEY WOULD SAY i WAS GUILTY OF "ELDER ABUSE"- OR "CRIMINAL CONFINEMENT; OR WHATEVER-
A WHOLE HOST OF LIBELOUS SLANDEROUS & DEFAMATORY CHARGES- WHICH - BECAUSE ITS IN CIVIL COURT-
THEY ARE TRYING TO OVERTURN & SUBVERT MY MOTHERS WILL.
- PRETTYMUCH SAYING I DIDNT LOVE MY MOTHER; THAT I DIDNT HAVE HER BEST INTERESTS AT HEART; AND THAT THEY SHOULD INSTEAD GET 2/3 OF THE ESTATE ASSETS THAT MOM WANTED ME TO HAVE & TAKE CARE OF THE FAMILY BUSINESS-
LIKE IN EUROPE- IRELAND ENGLAND- THE QUEEN OR KING- WILLS THEIR THRONE THEIR CASTLE THEIR GROUNDS & THE ROYAL TREASURY TO THEIR FIRST BORN SON-
AS LAID OUT IN "ENGLISH COMMON LAW; AND THE MAGNA CARTA-

SHE DID WHAT SHE DID FOR SEVERAL REASONS WHICH IM NOT AT LIBERTY TO DISCLOSE-
BUT THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE THIS ALL A SECRETIVE BACK ROOM DEAL- IN THE DARK WITHOUT ANYONE ELSE PUBLICLY LEARNING OF THEIR BETRAYALS; TREASON; TREACHERY; & "EVIL SCHEME"-

& THERE WILL BE LITIGATION- BECAUSE I LOVE MY MOTHER- I TOOK CARE OF HER THE BEST I COULD; SHE WAS PLEASED WITH MY CARE; AND LIVED HOW SHE WANTED TO LIVE & I WAS ALWAYS IN AGREEMENT-
SURE- WE HAD DISAGREEMENTS; EVERYBODY DOES-
BEING THE SOLE MALE FAMILY CAREGIVER FOR AN AGING PARENT WHO WANTS TO ENJOY HER DAYS AT HER OWN HOME- & NOT SOME OUTSIDE ASSISTED LIVING; NURSING HOME; OR ALZHEIMERS UNIT( WHICH THEY ALSO ALLEGE)

SO THEY COULD GET THEIR CLAWS INTO MOMS ASSETS INVESTMENTS HOUSE & KICK ME TO THE CURB-

THE PROBATE LAW CHAPTER IS PRETTY CLEAR.
AS IS THE CASE LAW & COURT OF APPEALS-
I AM IN THE RIGHT & THEY ARE JUST TRYING TO LEGALLY EXTORT MORE MONEY FROM ME- BECAUSE THEY ARE LIVING BEYOND THEIR MEANS-
MY YOUNGER SISTER-
#JULIE K CUSICK & MY OTHER SISTER #PATRICIA R LINDSAY

THEY OBVIOUSLY HAVE BEEN SCHEMING THIS FOR QUITE SOME TIME- AGAIN- I CANT GO INTO DETAIL; BUT THEY HAVE BEEN OUT & ABOUT SOLICITING ANYONE MY MOM MIGHT HAVE KNOWN OR DID BUSINESS WITH- IT WOULDNT SURPRISE ME IF THEY ARE QUESTIONING MY NEIGHBORS- ?
ANYWAY-
THIS IS JUST PURE EVIL ON THEIR PARTS- & GREEDY- AND GOD KNOWS WHAT ELSE:AND THEY CALL THEMSELVES SO CALLED "CHRISTIANS"- THEIR FACEBOOK PAGES HAVE ALL SORTS OF BULLSHIT PIOUS RELIGIOUS HYPOCRISY- ( OF COURSE- IF YOURE EVIL- MAKE LIKE YOUR HOLY- ITS EASIER THAT WAY TO STICK THE KNIFE)

SO- AGAIN- MY MOM LOVED ME; SHE WAS HAPPY I WAS LIVING WITH HER AS HER PERSONAL CAREGIVER & DAILY LIVING ASSISTANT- SHE WAS ALERT AWARE; COULD DO ALL HER DAILY BUSINESS BY HERSELF- -
SHE WAS ABLE TO LIVE IN HER HOME FOR 50 YEARS- UNTIL HER DEATH- FROM AGE 29- TO AGE 79-
-
MY EVIL THIEVING SISTERS WANT TO STEAL EVERYTHING- THEY TRIED TO STEAL ALL THE FAMILY PHOTO ALBUMS- I THINK I SHORT CIRCUITED THAT; AND GOT MOST OF THEM BACK SO FAR- MORE TO FOLLOW-
THERE ARE OTHER LETTERS & PAPERS THAT I HAVENT POSTED YET- BUT I WILL SOON ENOUGH-

MEANWHILE EVERYTHING IS TIED UP IN PROBATE COURT- WHICH MY MOTHER WANTED TO AVOID AS WELL- OPEN- FILE ESTATE; - TAKE CARE OF HER SON IN RETURN FOR HIS YEARS OF GOOD & FAITHFUL SERVICE; AND A WIN WIN FOR EVERYONE IF THEY WOULD JUST FOLLOW MY MOTHERS WILL.
- FRIVOLOUS & VEXATIOUS LAWSUIT-
X

#PattiLindsay aka #PatriciaRLindsay aka #PatriciaMarieRoach (left)

#JulieCusick aka #JulieKCusick aka #JulieKathleenRoach (right)

Photo from blog post cited in their court complaint noted above

the have also cited their home addresses; & other information- which is all public information online anyway-

or in court records of their own-

blog post in question- ( also cited in their complaint) 

link is here:

https://x-wire2012.blogspot.com/2018/04/julie-k-cusick-patricia-r-lindsay-are.html

full post title is this:

JULIE K CUSICK PATRICIA R LINDSAY ARE EVIL THIEVING SCHEMERS

so they re-posted all their personal public information for a couple posts that were taken down by me for their cooperation in returning stolen property from my mother's estate- attempted criminal conversion; lying; false preteses & false pretenses- 

After trying to keep it out of the POLICE & CRIINAL COURTS & HANDLT IT "IN-HOUSE"- WITHIN THE "FAMILY" - I WAS FORCED TO FILE A REPORT WITH THE #ALLENCOUNTYSHERIFF DEPT; AND WAS READY TO DO THE SAME WITH THE #FORTWAYNEPOLICEDEPARTMENT

SO NOW THEY ARE ALL PISSED OFF-  & ACTING LIKE =THEY=ARE THE VICTIMS IN ALL THIS ROACH FAMILY WIL CONTEST COURT & TABOID DRAMA -

& WHATS REALLY INFURIATING TO ME- IS THEY ARE ALLEGING ON A SIGNED SWORN COURT DOCUMENT- THAT I MALTREATED MY MOTHER & MY TWO @#%^&#@ SISTERS ARE DISHONORING & DISRESPECTING MY MOTHERS WISHES & CAREFULLY MADE PLAN- TO PROVIDE FOR HER SON- WHO TOOK CARE OF THINGS FOR HER FOR THE PAST 13/1/2 YEARS. 

SO WHOS TRULY BEING "DEFAMED"- i HAVE SHOWN REMARKABLE RESTRAING HERE IN TRYING TO LET THE LEGAL SYSTEM WORK; AND BY KEEPING THIS ALL "PEACEFUL" AND USING REASON THOUYGHTS LOGIC & WORDS TO  TO THE ACTIONS

SIGH.

X
X
X

X-WIRE

Friday, May 11, 2018